The Stanton Marris Blog

Articles from April 2010

  • Direct engagement over religious marriages

    Recently I was honoured to be asked to take the role of independent chair and skilled facilitator for an exciting new initiative from the Ministry of Justice.

    In response to the issue of religious marriages not being legally recognised, the Secretary of State for Justice, Jack Straw, supported face-to-face meetings to discuss these issues directly with Imams, given their influence in the community and role in officiating over religious marriages.

    Having a religious marriage that is not recognised under civil law, often means people can encounter difficulties with division of assets should the marriage break down, and with inheritance and pension issues if a partner dies. It can mean that couples cannot receive married couples’ benefits and can lead to problems when applying for passports or to institutions such as universities. Feedback from Islamic groups was that people wishing to get married would benefit from more mosques being registered as buildings where marriages can take place.

    Thirty seven Imams attended the event, including others with influence in the wider community. The discussion was honest and open, with many difficulties aired and ways forward developed. By the end, many Imams present had decided to register as registrars so as to be able to perform civil marriages as well as religious ones.

    The seminar was considered by those attending to be a valuable and worthwhile exercise, hopefully the first of many. For me, it was a powerful reminder that nothing succeeds in communication like face-to-face engagement, where you are able to listen to people and respond to them in the moment. In this way, new solutions to what seem like difficult problems can often be found.

    I’d also like to pass on the news that the North African food at the Muslim Cultural Heritage Centre in West London is absolutely delicious – and the chef is available for private parties!

    Read the full article "Direct engagement over religious marriages"

    Published April 28, 2010
    Written by Beatrice Hollyer. This article is filed under: ,
    No Comments

  • ‘More for less’ versus ‘waste’

    Since last year the biggest challenge for the UK public sector has been to find ways of doing “more for less”.  Now, however, we are starting to hear a lot more about “waste” – especially after the recent TV Chancellors’ Debate.  Is this just a change of words, or is the distinction important?

    Our big challenge is to reduce the public sector deficit as quickly as possible without putting the fragile recovery at risk.

    In this context, perhaps a focus on waste is useful. It certainly makes people think about how much taxpayers’ money is spent on activity of little or no value.  It might well stimulate them to redouble their efforts to find cost savings.  This would certainly help with reducing the deficit.

    However, from an economic perspective, the test is that public funds should be spent on activity which gives the best possible return on investment.  You could consider waste to be part of this story – we certainly should not be spending on activity which gives little, or even negative return.  But, just as importantly, we also should not be publically financing any projects if there are more alternative options which would give a better return.  When you think about it like this, perhaps “more for less!” makes more sense as a rallying cry.

    My impression is that most parts of the public sector are already looking for, and finding, cost savings, and also for more cost-effective options to initiative and projects.  Indeed they have been doing so for some time now.  At the same time, politicians are using the more emotive concept of waste to excite public awareness of the challenges on public spending, and to pressurize the public sector to find savings faster.

    So “waste” is fine for now, but “more for less” is the bigger prize.

    Read the full article "‘More for less’ versus ‘waste’"

    Published April 6, 2010
    Written by Rupert Symons. This article is filed under: ,
    No Comments